Re: Trying to define Surrogates
From: JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk>
Date: 18 Aug 2006 16:38:06 -0700
Message-ID: <1155944286.420977.298930_at_74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
Date: 18 Aug 2006 16:38:06 -0700
Message-ID: <1155944286.420977.298930_at_74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> I suspect you imagine distinctions that don't exist.
After further digesting of the responses in this thread I am content to say I am convinced. The only distinction to be made by denoting something as a surrogate is that it indicates the attribute was initiated during that specific design process, as a response to an identification problem highlighted when propositions were being formed. And I cannot see much use for that rather than indicating where control lies.
I appreciate the time people have spent responding. Received on Sat Aug 19 2006 - 01:38:06 CEST