Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:18:57 -0400
Message-Id: <nfksq3-4sr.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:20 GMT, Bob Badour
> <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>JOG wrote:
>>
>>> I have just invented a new layer called the 'conceptalogical layer'.
>>> It's meaningless obviously but sounds like just the sort of thing I
>>> could build a software business on. It's a winner I tell you
>>> </cynicism>
>>
>>It's going to have a tough time competing against my new logceptysical
>>model. Let's see who gets the book deal first! ;)
>
> My money is on JOG. His term is easy to say. Yours is awkward.
>
> I take that back. *MY* model is better. I call it
> "Conilogisal". In accordance with the first syllable, I am prepared
> to accept bribes in order to leave the market to the two of you.
> Please be generous.
-- Kenneth Downs Secure Data Software, Inc. (Ken)nneth_at_(Sec)ure(Dat)a(.com)Received on Thu Aug 10 2006 - 23:18:57 CEST