Re: computational model of transactions
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:47:02 GMT
Message-ID: <WJRzg.302570$iF6.86168_at_pd7tw2no>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:47:02 GMT
Message-ID: <WJRzg.302570$iF6.86168_at_pd7tw2no>
Bob Badour wrote:
> ...
>
> There is nothing intermediate about it. I think you are talking about
> splitting logical unit of work into multiple units of work, which is
> something entirely different. Your comment suggests to me you have
> worked with Oracle and it's, ahem, wasteful and unforgiving use of
> rollback segments.
> ...
First time I've heard it suggested I knew anything about Oracle. Not flattered.
p Received on Wed Aug 02 2006 - 01:47:02 CEST