Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me

George wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
> >
> > I don't recall claiming to have defined it. I described it's origin and
> > construction. Do you see what I mean by your stupidity preventing you
> > from comprehending relatively simple english? You are not smart enough
> > to understand what is actually written so you respond to something
> > entirely different instead.
>
> Now you "don't recall claiming to have defined it", here's what you
> said:
>
> > OO is a computational model and not a paradigm unless by 'paradigm' one
> > means an example of a computational model. Idiot. Further, it is a
> > computational model comprising a collection of features useful for
> > constructing large unpredictable state machines from small predictable
> > state machines or otherwise picked arbitrarily in the mid to late 1960's
> > for what seemed expedient at the time.
>
> You say what you believe OO is and what it is not, that looks like an
> (informal) definition to me.

As near as I can tell, you are the only one who thinks that with the above paragraph, Bob was attempting to define OO. Certainly I don't think that, and it is also clear Bob doesn't think that.

Marshall Received on Thu Jun 29 2006 - 04:16:40 CEST