Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me
From: Andrew McDonagh <news_at_andmc.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 19:39:13 +0100
Message-ID: <e7ml96$drs$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
>
> Thank you for stepping forward to exemplify my recent statement that use
> of the word 'paradigm' is the surest sign of a self-aggrandizing
> ignorant.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 19:39:13 +0100
Message-ID: <e7ml96$drs$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
Bob Badour wrote:
> H. S. Lahman wrote:
>> Responding to Badour... >> >>>>> OO is hierarchy. >>>> >>>> LOL. This pretty much says it all. I suggest learning something >>>> about OOA/D; it would make the trolling more credible. >>> >>> With all due respect, I see no reason to think his education in OOA/D >>> is lacking in any way. While his statement is a simplification and a >>> generalization, it is accurate at least to a first-order approximation. >> >> I can't think of a single statement that would be more antithetical to >> what the OO paradigm is about.
>
> Thank you for stepping forward to exemplify my recent statement that use
> of the word 'paradigm' is the surest sign of a self-aggrandizing
> ignorant.
I'm losing count now, but I think you have said that around 15 times in
this thread alone...
After all, 'paradigm' has many meanings where for each meaning
> a better word exists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword
>
Snipped Bob's usual standard of contribution....
<Said in the Jerry Springer style)
"Go-Bob, Go-Bob, Go-Bob"