Re: What databases have taught me
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:00:19 GMT
Message-ID: <7V1ng.1381$pu3.36963_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> Dynamic polymorphism? What's that?
>
> I'm familiar with operations defined over more than one type
> of operand and with different operations having the same
> operator - but I don't know what you mean when you say "dynamic."
>
> And please explain "directed towards the purpose of managing dependencies."
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:00:19 GMT
Message-ID: <7V1ng.1381$pu3.36963_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
J M Davitt wrote:
>> On 2006-06-22 20:34:48 -0500, "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> said: >> >>> OO is hierarchy. >> >> I disagree. We learned that OO was not hiearchy in the early 90s. OO >> is dynamic polymorpism directed towards the purpose of managing >> dependencies.
>
> Dynamic polymorphism? What's that?
>
> I'm familiar with operations defined over more than one type
> of operand and with different operations having the same
> operator - but I don't know what you mean when you say "dynamic."
>
> And please explain "directed towards the purpose of managing dependencies."
J M,
Robert Martin is a self-aggrandizing ignorant. He likes to string together meaningless sequences of important sounding gibberish. Surely you realise this by now. Received on Sat Jun 24 2006 - 05:00:19 CEST