Re: What databases have taught me

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:00:19 GMT
Message-ID: <7V1ng.1381$pu3.36963_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>


J M Davitt wrote:

> Robert Martin wrote:
>

>> On 2006-06-22 20:34:48 -0500, "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> said:
>>
>>> OO is hierarchy.
>>
>> I disagree.  We learned that OO was not hiearchy in the early 90s.  OO 
>> is dynamic polymorpism directed towards the purpose of managing 
>> dependencies.

>

> Dynamic polymorphism? What's that?
>
> I'm familiar with operations defined over more than one type
> of operand and with different operations having the same
> operator - but I don't know what you mean when you say "dynamic."
>
> And please explain "directed towards the purpose of managing dependencies."

J M,

Robert Martin is a self-aggrandizing ignorant. He likes to string together meaningless sequences of important sounding gibberish. Surely you realise this by now. Received on Sat Jun 24 2006 - 05:00:19 CEST

Original text of this message