Re: RDMBS samples
Date: 19 Jun 2006 04:12:07 -0700
You can pretty much bet that if it implements SQL, it's not an R-DBMS, but it's an SQL-DBMS. The difference between relations and SQL tables is something that gets chewed over a lot on this group. (On some threads, you may want to get a fire-retardant suit ... ;)
> My mistake! I was in a hurry and I wrote RDMBS instead of RDBMS..
> Relational DBMS products...
> What about SqlServer2000, can be consider as a RDBMS product?
> Thanks all!
Received on Mon Jun 19 2006 - 13:12:07 CEST