Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
Date: 16 Jun 2006 13:09:10 -0700
I did not insult him. I was just pointing out that most of his replies
were insulting and not
exactly oozing with "substantive arguments". Were they present, he wouldn't need to resort to "using small predictable state machines to build large unpredictable state machines is bad" from time to time.
My quoting of his insulting replies did nothing except demonstrate that he frequently makes use of insulting replies.
And about the point of the discussion, I merely gave my 2 cents. My opinion. Not "substantive argument" and it's not meant to turn his or your head around. I recognize it to be impossible and I'm not treading down that dark alley.
> marco.antonio.costa_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > Bob Badour has said this:
> > > Some people,
> So, if I understand you correctly, it's bad when Bob insults
> people, and you want to publicize this fact by insulting
> him. It's bad when he posts things that don't have
> substantive argument in them, which you "demonstrate"
> by making a collection of insults he's made removed from
> the substantive context, and embedding them in a post that
> lacks any substantive argument.
Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 22:09:10 CEST