Re: Lets get physical

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 16 Jun 2006 09:00:46 -0700
Message-ID: <1150473646.517948.35360@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>

Playing with words is easy...making sense out of them is a different matter...

Still waiting for your responses on RAM issues...I stated you were wrong and proved it...

Bob Badour wrote:
> J M Davitt wrote:
>
> > Cimode wrote:
> >
> >> Are you mentally impaired?
> >>
> >> I have posted specific sentences from FP totally negating your initial
> >> statement that FP would have advocated that TRM is not physical...
> >
> >
> > Quoting directly from the URI you posted,
> >
> > TRM is at a lower level than the relational model (RM),
> > it is nevertheless a model, and not a physical implementation.
> >
> > So, I'm confused: how is it that you assert paulc is incorrect when
> > saying that TRM is not physical?
>
> In my defense, when I conclude people are mentally impaired, the idiots
> have given ample evidence to support the conclusion.
Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 11:00:46 CDT