Re: Lets get physical

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 16 Jun 2006 02:53:55 -0700
Message-ID: <1150451635.732204.38410_at_r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


So?

TRM is a model for what?

Logical layer of Data Management have been already expressed and sharpenned for RM throughout the years. Remains the physical layer of RM who has not been sufficiently adressed...TRM is a first step...That's why it complements RM..It is lower level...

J M Davitt wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
> > Are you mentally impaired?
> >
> > I have posted specific sentences from FP totally negating your initial
> > statement that FP would have advocated that TRM is not physical...
>
> Quoting directly from the URI you posted,
>
> TRM is at a lower level than the relational model (RM),
> it is nevertheless a model, and not a physical implementation.
>
> So, I'm confused: how is it that you assert paulc is incorrect when
> saying that TRM is not physical?
>
> >
> > paul c a écrit :
> >
> >
> >>Cimode wrote:
> >>
> >>>Check this page
> >>>
> >>>http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/1548800.htm for more info...
> >>>
> >>
> >>I think one would have to search all the pages to prove it's not there.
> >>
> >>p
> >
> >
> >
Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 11:53:55 CEST

Original text of this message