Re: Lets get physical
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:29:40 GMT
Bob Badour wrote:
> J M Davitt wrote:
>> Cimode wrote: >> >>> Are you mentally impaired? >>> >>> I have posted specific sentences from FP totally negating your initial >>> statement that FP would have advocated that TRM is not physical... >> >> >> Quoting directly from the URI you posted, >> >> TRM is at a lower level than the relational model (RM), >> it is nevertheless a model, and not a physical implementation. >> >> So, I'm confused: how is it that you assert paulc is incorrect when >> saying that TRM is not physical?
> In my defense, when I conclude people are mentally impaired, the idiots
> have given ample evidence to support the conclusion.
(aside) I am regularly impaired, but at least I usually know it. Also, as that great English-speaker, WSC, said, I'll be sober in the morning, so, so long for now.
ps: apologies to the memory of WSC for all the commas. i've had some great laughs today, even before i got impaired!
To make a twist on what that great English-speaker, WSC, said, Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 04:29:40 CEST