| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Operationalize orthogonality
Tony D wrote:
> x wrote:
>
>>"Tony D" <tonyisyourpal_at_netscape.net> wrote in message >>news:1149504303.205324.83320_at_j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> >>>x wrote: >>> >>> >>>>How complicated! It would not be easyer to follow Mr. Codd advice ? >>>>Domains, not types. >> >>>And the difference between a domain and a type is what ? Precisely ? >> >>The "standard" answer would be "educate yourself". :-)
The answer depends on whether one accepts specialization by constraint as specifying a new type. If one does, then domain and type are synonymous. If one does not, then a domain is generally a specified subset of some type used in a specified context.
>>I don't know how "precisely" you want me to be.
>>I would say that my current understanding of this (because I have not yet >>read Codd's 1990 book - which I strongly recommend because I browsed it) is >>that domains do not include any kind of operator.
>>What is your opinion ?
![]() |
![]() |