Re: OT fallacies

From: mAsterdam <>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:44:23 +0200
Message-ID: <448353ea$0$31649$>

Patrick May wrote:

> mAsterdam writes:

>>Patrick May wrote:
>>>Alfredo Novoa writes:
>>>>What Martin and others write in comp.object is nearly as foolish
>>>>as that.
>>> So you keep claiming. Backing up your claims, even once,
>>>would be a lot more convincing than the hot air and puerile
>>>insults that I've seen so far.
>>I've just read up on the c.o. thread that was the prelude to this
>>little culture clash [ . . . ] and while I don't particularly like
>>his style (as he well knows), Alfredo Novoa is IMO doing quite a
>>good job at backing up his claims - especially those challenged in a
>>clear way.
>      Could you please point out specific messages where Mr. Novoa has
> supported his claims of Mr. Martin's foolishness?  All I've seen from
> him with respect to that issue is insults and unfounded arrogance.

I already pointed you to a thread. You searched it and still didn't find him "Backing up your[his] claims, even once"?

Strange. Hmm... Maybe you started by looking for clearly stated challenges there.

BTW If you find an interesting one, will you point it out? Received on Sun Jun 04 2006 - 23:44:23 CEST

Original text of this message