Re: OT fallacies
Date: 4 Jun 2006 11:48:56 -0700
Patrick May ha escrito:
> That's an . . . interesting defense of rudeness, but avoids the
> real issue in the thread that spawned this one. Mr. Badour, among
> others, immediately accused Mr. Martin, among others, of "ignorance"
> and "foolishness" without responding to Mr. Martin's arguments.
> Further, Mr. Badour claimed to have addressed those arguments but
> refused to provide evidence of having done so.
Imagine that someone joins to a medicine group and starts to write that promiscuous sex without protection is completely safe, presenting evidently ridiculous and tricked arguments.
Which kind of responses would you expect?
What Martin and others write in comp.object is nearly as foolish as that. Received on Sun Jun 04 2006 - 20:48:56 CEST