Re: wise words
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:24:46 +0300
Message-ID: <e50u2e$h3a$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
"Frank Hamersley" <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:vYKcg.9533$S7.2131_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> x wrote:
> > "Erwin" <e.smout_at_myonline.be> wrote in message
> > news:1148383814.250987.164070_at_u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> >> Can someone pls spell me out the precise objective criteria for
> >> distinguishing "wise words" from "aged wisdom" ?
> >
> >> Or is that just a matter of what one absolutely wants to believe and
> >> what not ?
> >
> > I don't know about that.
> > I can only notice that "aged wisdom" might show its age.
> You could also presume it has been tested on many occasions and still
> prevails. A bit like Codd's 12 in this place.
The ones who don't have old men/women around should buy some. Received on Wed May 24 2006 - 08:24:46 CEST