Re: A Logical Model for Lists as Relations

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 12 May 2006 08:51:56 -0700
Message-ID: <1147449116.410514.118290_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


> Bob: Does it surprise you at all that one of the newsgroup's resident cranks not only fails to question the logical requirements but jumps straight to imagined physical requirements?

The logical requirement is represent anything in the most general/flexible/systematic manner.

> Bob: Does it surprise you at all that the resident crank has no concept of abstract thought and can think only in terms of existing products and concrete examples?

You can't get more abstract than thing.

Db for Dummies & Cranks! or Db for Cranking Dummies! Which do you prefer Bob :) Received on Fri May 12 2006 - 17:51:56 CEST

Original text of this message