Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 8 May 2006 07:23:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1147098218.173061.249350_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> Well, then I am sorry for not saying explicitly several times that I was
> talking about GROUP as defined in Tutorial D in the Third Manifesto,
> leaving open the possibility that you can define "GROUP" to mean
> something else. But wait, I did!
Date: 8 May 2006 07:23:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1147098218.173061.249350_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
>
> Well, then I am sorry for not saying explicitly several times that I was
> talking about GROUP as defined in Tutorial D in the Third Manifesto,
> leaving open the possibility that you can define "GROUP" to mean
> something else. But wait, I did!
I am happy to consider the misunderstanding to have been entirely on my part.
> I take it that you accept that Tutorial D's GROUP is not an aggregate
> operator, then.
I am entirely willing to take your word for it.
Marshall Received on Mon May 08 2006 - 16:23:38 CEST