Re: All hail Neo!
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:09:46 GMT
Message-ID: <_4T3g.66352$VV4.1268982_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:09:46 GMT
Message-ID: <_4T3g.66352$VV4.1268982_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall Spight wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>
>>This is irrevant to the question.
>
> Indeed. The basic equation isn't sound, and there's no
> getting around that.
>
> Start with a language L. Add feature F to get language L'.
> L' is less expressive that language L. Solve for F.
>
> For all L: result is the empty set.
>
> (Note that I do not say "null.")
You have a faulty assumption. You assume that feature F has no effect on the set of existing features of L. The assumption is false, as is your conclusion. Received on Thu Apr 27 2006 - 01:09:46 CEST