Re: IDIOT! Your Data Model Can't Possibly Work!
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:23:55 GMT
Message-ID: <L4v0g.60870$VV4.1129266_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> This is so funny! Bob, for half a decade you have been telling me that
> my data model couldn't possibly work, that I didn't have this or that
> operator, or this or that predicate, didn't attend this or that
> college, or have this or that experience;
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:23:55 GMT
Message-ID: <L4v0g.60870$VV4.1129266_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Neo wrote:
>>Transfered here from "Multiplicity, Change and MV" thread (at OP's request). >>Bob Badour: Neo, you are so full of shit your eyes must be brown. You are an ignorant who doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. ... NIAM, nijssen and halpin. They set the reference point for conceptual modelling about 20 years ago. Since that time, I have seen nothing I would consider a groundshaking improvement; although, Jan or Vadim might have a better idea if something significantly changed the state of the art in recent years.
>
>
> This is so funny! Bob, for half a decade you have been telling me that
> my data model couldn't possibly work, that I didn't have this or that
> operator, or this or that predicate, didn't attend this or that
> college, or have this or that experience;
Bullshit. I have been informing people you are ignorant and stupid. Too stupid, in fact, to understand any aspect of the subject area you claim to have improved. Received on Sun Apr 16 2006 - 19:23:55 CEST