Re: abnormal forms
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:18:44 GMT
Message-ID: <o980g.25403$WI1.2059_at_pd7tw2no>
>
>
> Maybe you should define an abnormal join first. :-)
>
>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:18:44 GMT
Message-ID: <o980g.25403$WI1.2059_at_pd7tw2no>
x wrote:
> "paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message
> news:QHa%f.6021$WI1.5342_at_pd7tw2no...
>
> ...
>
>>For example, (using ttm-style braces and for convenience omitting type >>names), is a SUPP{S#} relation logically the same value as a SUPP{{S#}} >>relation that is (somehow) constrained to have only one tuple? (not to >>be confused with one that somehow allows multiple tuples).
>
>
> Maybe you should define an abnormal join first. :-)
>
>
p Received on Sat Apr 15 2006 - 17:18:44 CEST