| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: The stupidest design I ever saw
> What is wrong with deleting the is-a(doctor,human) from the is-a relation
> and adding the is-a(alien,doctor) ?
I didn't understand your suggestion completely. Could you post the resulting hierarchy after adding alien-doctor bill. Below is the original class hierarchy, prior to encountering alien-doctor bill.
human
__engineer ____bob __doctor ____sue
> > ... there is an indirect/derivable, but no direct, relationship between classes human and doctor.
> Why is is-a relation an indirect relation?
I did not assert is-a relation is indirect. I asserted that there is an indirect/derivable, but not direct, relationship between classes human and doctor. I prefer to withdraw this assertion as it will likely become an end-less discussion involving the definition of indirect/derivable, direct, relationship, etc. Received on Tue Apr 11 2006 - 16:19:01 CDT
![]() |
![]() |