Re: circular relationships ok?
From: vc <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 4 Mar 2006 20:01:01 -0800
Message-ID: <1141531261.247966.182660_at_z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 4 Mar 2006 20:01:01 -0800
Message-ID: <1141531261.247966.182660_at_z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Brian Selzer wrote:
> If I follow your notation,
>
> forall b (b in Br --> b in Bs) is true and
> forall b (b in Bs --> b in Br) is also true, and must be because of the
> circular foreign key relationship.
Right, I forgot about the relationship being circular. In this case, you are aboslutely right -- all the sets will be of the same size.
[...]
> >
Received on Sun Mar 05 2006 - 05:01:01 CET