Re: MV Keys

mAsterdam wrote:
[...]>
> Yep. So what should it be?

I do not know -- you've devised the operation. My point is that concurrency is irrelevant whatever the operation is.

>
> > I was objecting to your invoking the ghost of concurrency:
> >
> > "Aside (the example surely illustrates your point)
> > could this removeAt operation possibly be useful
> > in a concurrent environment?
> > "
>
> I see a difference in the use of indices
> between a list under single control and a shared list.

Why do you care about the implementation ?

>
> > I do not know whether the operation is useful per se, you tell me.
>
> Don't know really. Hmm... try:
>
> The contestants ended on 2nd place ex equo. For the ceremony add
> a second prize for 2nd place, and remove the third prize (desired
> effect: 2 silver medals, no bronze medal).
Received on Sun Mar 05 2006 - 01:57:37 CET