Re: Database design

"Roy Hann" <specially_at_processed.almost.meat> wrote:

>"Volker Hetzer" <volker.hetzer_at_ieee.org> wrote in message
>news:dtco8s$scn$2_at_nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com...
>> Roy Hann schrieb:

>> From an n+1 dimensional point of view it always is.

>Yep, but is that what was intended? :-)

I simply wondered that a set could never be considered sorted. Apparently, if a set cannot include proper ordering, then a proper ordering of n-elements must be reduced to n-sets? Nine players in the starting line-up require nine separate relations? or practically, nine separate tables? Received on Wed Feb 22 2006 - 21:01:03 CET