Re: OT - Best way to handle dbdebunk

In the last exciting episode, Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>Given the extremely low signal to noise ratio, it seems doubly
>>>disingenuous to suggest one may not point others toward the signal.
>> I encourage you to point others towards the signal.
>
> No, you didn't. I let people know that Vadim's mind is exceptional,
> and you chastised me for it. A lot of what little signal exists in
> this newsgroup comes from Vadim and Jan.

Look, most of what you generate amounts to "noise." Sometimes it's noise that tells people why they're off base, but often it's not.

If you contributed to the "signal" part by generating some positive signal, that is, some positive claims about what theory there is and perhaps that there should be, that would actually improve the S:N ratio. As it stands, you're not doing that...

-- 
output = ("cbbrowne" "_at_" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/wp.html
Rules  of  the  Evil Overlord  #80.  "If  my  weakest troops  fail  to
eliminate a  hero, I will send  out my best troops  instead of wasting
time with progressively stronger ones  as he gets closer and closer to
my fortress." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>