Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec

From: Jeff Clausius <nuclausius_at_tendlrow.tta.ten>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:41:34 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns976B586EE588Ajclausiusworldnetatt@204.127.199.17>

Yes, I agree. Inline answering should be used for quick question/answers. There is no real absolute is there?

However, for larger discussions where there are paragraphs of text in the post, top-posting still rules.

To each their own.

Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org> wrote in news:878xsdjszr.fsf_at_wolfe.cbbrowne.com:

> Jeff Clausius <nuclausius_at_tendlrow.tta.ten> wrote:

>> Frank:
>>

>
> Bottom posting is as heinous as top posting. Neither should be done.
>
Received on Wed Feb 15 2006 - 08:41:34 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Knut Stolze: "Re: Do I need a PK on a join table?"
Previous message: Knut Stolze: "Re: Do I need a PK on a join table?"
In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Next in thread: Joel Garry: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US