Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec
From: Tony Rogerson <tonyrogerson_at_sqlserverfaq.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:56:22 -0000
Message-ID: <dslj0v$5s6$1$8302bc10_at_news.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:56:22 -0000
Message-ID: <dslj0v$5s6$1$8302bc10_at_news.demon.co.uk>
> Well - Oracle also supports CLR in the database as well. However the
> ability to extend a database with stored procedures etc written in CLR,
> Java or even a database's own data processing language does not equate to
> the ability to add new features to the database.
-- Tony Rogerson SQL Server MVP http://sqlserverfaq.com - free video tutorials "Mark Townsend" <markbtownsend_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:43EE4619.3070100_at_comcast.net...Received on Sat Feb 11 2006 - 21:56:22 CET
> Tony Rogerson wrote:
>>>I agree there are people who are blind and can't see sqlserver will
>>>not have the same set of features as Oracle in even a hundred years
>>
>>
>> Does it need it? SQL Server has CLR which means it can be expanded
>> infinitely.
>>
>
> Well - Oracle also supports CLR in the database as well. However the
> ability to extend a database with stored procedures etc written in CLR,
> Java or even a database's own data processing language does not equate to
> the ability to add new features to the database.
>
> But I suspect that you knew that and are just being ornery