Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec

Well, then , Frank, I guess you won't reply to this one, eh?

No I don't use a decent new reader myself and I would appreciate it if all WOULD top post. Many's the time I don't bother to read something because its too frigging long way down.

So thanks, Tony, for making it easy to read...

Chandru Murthi

"Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:dsimqj$1tp$1_at_news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Tony Rogerson wrote:
>> Right then Joel, lets have a go then.
>>
>> Whats your argument?
>>
>> Even on a build your own box costing around £500 can deliver over
>> 50MBytes /
>> second write and read speeds using Windows Server.
>>
>> Go for the 64 bit version and you can get quite a few GBytes of memory,
>> most
>> entry level boards <£100 take 4GB of DDR.
>>
>
> Don't top post - can I suggest you use a decent news reader?
> As you see, your ugly format/utility cuts off the rest of the thread.
>
> Point is: a decent Linux will deliver better throughput on the *same*
> hardware. Changed 'twice the' into 'better'. Can't substantiate twice,
> can better.
>
> And personally, I'd love to see you stop promoting non-oracle stuff
> here. It's annoying; most people here hate Microsoft anyway.
> Just a little further, and you're spamming.
> --
> Regards,
> Frank van Bortel
>
> Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Fri Feb 10 2006 - 21:54:30 CET