Re: MV and SQL

From: B Faux <nospam_at_nospam.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:56:12 GMT
Message-ID: <gF9Bf.6892$NS6.4284_at_newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>

>>
>> "I've got a hammer called SQL, and every problem is a nail."
>> "Yeah, right."
>> "I've got a hammer called Pick, and every problem is a nail."
>> "Yeah, right."
>

Slight modification-

I've got a screwdriver called SQL...

I've got a hammer called Pick...

Question - Would you rather be hammered or screwed??

BFaux ;-) Received on Mon Jan 23 2006 - 19:56:12 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: JOG: "Re: MV and SQL"
Previous message: x: "Re: Separation of DDL and DML - was: Early and late binding."
Maybe in reply to: David Cressey: "MV and SQL"
Next in thread: michael_at_preece.net: "Re: MV and SQL"
Reply: michael_at_preece.net: "Re: MV and SQL"
Reply: michael_at_preece.net: "Re: MV and SQL"
Reply: dawn: "Re: MV and SQL"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message