Re: So what's null then if it's not nothing?
From: vc <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 20 Dec 2005 10:02:51 -0800
Message-ID: <1135101771.500753.166330_at_g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 20 Dec 2005 10:02:51 -0800
Message-ID: <1135101771.500753.166330_at_g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Jon Heggland wrote:
> In article <1135009623.261858.9330_at_g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> boston103_at_hotmail.com says...
> >
> > So is it your assertion that 2 + X evaluates to NULL if X happens to be
> > NULL ? If so, what is '+' then ?
>
> '+' is irrelevant. :) In any case, I'm not interested in defending how
> SQL NULLs work.
Sound good to me. Ignorance is a choice, surely. Received on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 19:02:51 CET