Re: So what's null then if it's not nothing?
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:52:25 GMT
Message-ID: <t7%kf.47403$ki.14423_at_pd7tw2no>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:52:25 GMT
Message-ID: <t7%kf.47403$ki.14423_at_pd7tw2no>
> ...
> No. He doesn't define equivalence; AND, OR and NOT is not sufficient. He
> could very well have envisioned an equivalence truth table where w<->w
> is w, not T.
> ...
Just interloping here, so I don't really know the thrust of the conversation, but the above caught my eye. If w<->w is meant as 'w if and only if w', surely <AND> is equivalent?
p Received on Mon Dec 05 2005 - 18:52:25 CET