Re: Hierarchy as 'UP' constraint
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:25:55 +0100
Message-ID: <4387023c$0$11075$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:25:55 +0100
Message-ID: <4387023c$0$11075$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
x wrote:
> I forgot to add "INSTEAD OF INSERT and INSTEAD OF UPDATE are left as an
> exercise for the reader." :-)
What about WHERE LEVEL = 3 ? Received on Fri Nov 25 2005 - 13:25:55 CET