Re: So what's null then if it's not nothing?
From: Hugo Kornelis <hugo_at_pe_NO_rFact.in_SPAM_fo>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:39:57 +0100
Message-ID: <45gco1t0dfqsb7mghlq0i8gsr80hqu5q58_at_4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:39:57 +0100
Message-ID: <45gco1t0dfqsb7mghlq0i8gsr80hqu5q58_at_4ax.com>
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:49:46 +0200, x wrote:
(snip)
>Then how do you distinguish among Objects that are known to have no Color
>and Objects that have an unknown Color ?
Hi x,
If it's relevant to distinguish, then it has to be part of the data model.
If a certain type of objects is known never to have a color, then this has to be done with a subtype - the color attribute should only be present on the subtypes that can have a color.
If it's not related to object type but only to specific objects and the distinction between "known not to have a color" or "color unknown" is relevant, then there as to be an attribute "reason of color absense".
Best, Hugo
-- (Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)Received on Thu Nov 24 2005 - 23:39:57 CET