Re: So what's null then if it's not nothing?

From: Jon Heggland <>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:40:28 +0100
Message-ID: <>

In article <438456fe$>, says...
> > You mean you would create a table for each *combination* of attributes?
> > What on earth for?
> In order to avoid nulls (there is an opinion that they need to be
> removed from schema).

I get that part. But why one for each combination? Why not just one per attribute?

Received on Wed Nov 23 2005 - 14:40:28 CET

Original text of this message