Re: Lock-free databases
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:05:45 -0500
Message-ID: <m3d5lf84h2.fsf_at_mobile.int.cbbrowne.com>
> "Joachim Pense" <spam-collector_at_pense-online.de> wrote in message
> news:dkiaao$r43$05$1_at_news.t-online.com...
>> VC:
>>> In MVTSO, a data item in addition to the transaction timestamp
>>> that created the item has a read timestamp. In this model reads
>>> always succeed, and writes are rejected and restarted if their
>>> timestamp is smaller than the data item read timestamp.
>>
>> What does "restarted" mean here? Can that mean "automatically", or
>> does it just mean "rejected and reconsidered by the application if
>> the write should still be done"?
>
> The standard MVTSO model implies automatic restart.
If a legal update is blocked from proceeding, then that's more than close enough to being a "lock" that it surely ought to feel uncomfortable to claim "it's a non-locking model."
-- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="gmail.com" in String.concat "_at_" [name;tld];; http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #222. "I reserve the right to execute any henchmen who appear to be a little too intelligent, powerful, or devious. However if I do so, I will not at some subsequent point shout "Why am I surrounded by these incompetent fools?!" <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>Received on Sat Nov 05 2005 - 17:05:45 CET