Oracle FAQ

Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Do we always have to update or insert? Why can't we just relate?

Re: Do we always have to update or insert? Why can't we just relate?

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:04:09 GMT
Message-ID: <dn%4f.219924$1i.154315@pd7tw2no>

Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> ...
>
> Good point on theory, but the inserts are one-at-a-time, so the
> analogy is not strong.
> ...

aren't they supposed to be 'set-at-a-time'?

p Received on Tue Oct 18 2005 - 00:04:09 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: davidbryce_at_fastmail.fm: "Re: Design for Category Feature"
Previous message: paul c: "Re: Do we always have to update or insert? Why can't we just relate?"
In reply to: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Do we always have to update or insert? Why can't we just relate?"
Next in thread: Roy Hann: "Re: Do we always have to update or insert? Why can't we just relate?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US