Re: Encoding materialized path in an atomic value.
From: VC <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 19:34:51 -0400
Message-ID: <Z6CdnWvceIkPf6jeRVn-oQ_at_comcast.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 19:34:51 -0400
Message-ID: <Z6CdnWvceIkPf6jeRVn-oQ_at_comcast.com>
"David Cressey" <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:LeiZe.4395$q1.1085_at_newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> "VC" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eYadnd0PbbUUyqjeRVn-jg_at_comcast.com...
[...]
>
>> By the way, representing the materialized path as '1.22.7.16' rather
>> than
>> 'john.kate.bob.sam' is an example of converting an unordered tree to an
>> ordered one.
>
> Yes. And nested sets imposes an order as well.... the order in which the
> "little worm" visits the nodes.
>
Yes, you are quite right.
>
>
>
Received on Sun Sep 25 2005 - 01:34:51 CEST