Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
From: Paul <paul_at_test.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:34:25 +0100
Message-ID: <42ff0210$0$1297$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
>
> Not really, it is standard for the interval type. Joining single to
> interval says single must be within the interval. At least this is what
> you come up with if you are thinking of expressing intervals as uniques and
> references.
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:34:25 +0100
Message-ID: <42ff0210$0$1297$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Kenneth Downs wrote:
>>b) a single interval column? Then you have a problem joining to the >>start date of the interval. The interval is atomic, but you could have a >>start() function that picks out the start of the interval. Even so, this >>ceases to be a standard join.
>
> Not really, it is standard for the interval type. Joining single to
> interval says single must be within the interval. At least this is what
> you come up with if you are thinking of expressing intervals as uniques and
> references.
What I'm saying is if you want separate joins both to the interval *and* to the start or end dates.
Paul. Received on Sun Aug 14 2005 - 10:34:25 CEST