Re: The naive test for equality
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:52:29 -0700
Message-ID: <ejipf1532eqtka5fe1854ogi6jhvfk6esm_at_4ax.com>
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:19:08 -0400, "VC" <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
wrote:
[snip]
>Of course not. Why would one want to use the same name for two different
It can happen when two different points-of-view intersect.
Realising that two apparently different entities are actually the same
can be tricky, especially when they appear at first to be different.
>entities [self-inflicted pain] ? If imagination is lacking, and one prefers
>to call an entity a Thing, one can use at least Thing1, Thing2,,, ad
>infinitum., if needed., in order to avoid the homonym problem. Synonyms
>are even easier, just use one, not two or more, names for the same entity
>and you should be all set.
If you realise that you have such a situation.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Received on Fri Aug 12 2005 - 19:52:29 CEST