| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
dawn wrote:
> 2. The way that these alternatives are tossed aside is by marrying the
> models to hierarchical and network and then dismissing those as having
> failed already. I realze you cannot put everything in an interview, but
> I have read quite a bit of Date's writings and haven't seem much more
> rationale than what is given here.
>
> Is there a mathematical argument that shows why these approaches should
> be tossed aside as having nothing to offer?
I think it comes from practical experience of these models being complicated to use rather than any theoretical argument. I've never used hierarchical or networks database but I understand people who did found relational database much easier to use and develop.
The old-style databases must have been theoretically correct at some level otherwise no-one would have used them if they were costantly giving wrong results.
Paul. Received on Wed Aug 03 2005 - 15:53:18 CDT
![]() |
![]() |