Re: A
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:22:43 GMT
Message-ID: <7y7Ae.141527$xo.7298142_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
>
> Doesn't this only apply if you are considering the set of all relations
> over all domains? What if you restrict yourself to a finite set of
> domains? I can't see how Cantor's Paradox would apply in this case.
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:22:43 GMT
Message-ID: <7y7Ae.141527$xo.7298142_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
Paul wrote:
> Jan Hidders wrote:
>
>>>>In some sense you might say that is is "too large" to be a set. The >>>>collection of all relations has the same problem. >>> >>>I'm skeptical to this, but if it is too difficult to explain (or to >>>give an example of a problem), I'll let it be for the moment. >> >>I'll give another hint. Since unary relations are similar to sets you >>can get Cantor's paradox.
>
> Doesn't this only apply if you are considering the set of all relations
> over all domains? What if you restrict yourself to a finite set of
> domains? I can't see how Cantor's Paradox would apply in this case.
- Jan Hidders