Re: Sub-Entities

From: Noel <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 07:59:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4hnhc154dqsfuscqvgkg3q3dphp43p775c_at_4ax.com>

On 3 Jul 2005 09:31:03 -0700, "-CELKO-" <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net> wrote:

>>> If individuals and organizations don't share a parent table what should the DDL for the orders table be? <<
>
>I look to my rule about industry standards and not inventing my own
>codes and find the Dun & Bradstreeet numbers for customers. I do not
>care if it is a company or a person as long as they pay on time.

And if they don't have Dun & Bradstreet numbers, then you don't do business with them? Received on Mon Jul 04 2005 - 08:59:27 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: Jon Heggland: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Maybe in reply to: wbarthol_at_gmail.com: "Sub-Entities"
In reply to -CELKO-: "Re: Sub-Entities"
Next in thread: Jon Heggland: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Reply: (deleted message) Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Sub-Entities"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message