Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

From: VC <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 17:32:53 -0400
Message-ID: <g96dnThMNL_oxFXfRVn-gg@comcast.com> 





Hi,



"Jon Heggland" <heggland_at_idi.ntnu.no> wrote in message 
news:MPG.1d32414e2f1bbf959896d3_at_news.ntnu.no...

>. To repeat myself, I quite like ORM. The NOLOT/LOT distinction




> may even be a useful abstraction for modelling, but to claim that ORM is

> logically different from the RM, and that the difference is crippling

> the RM, is counterproductive.




If you like ORM,  you apparently understand what a LOT is.  Could you please 
provide, for my benefit,  a [semi]formal definition of what a LOT really is 
?



Thanks.



> -- 

> Jon 

Received on Sun Jul 03 2005 - 16:32:53 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US