Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

From: VC <>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 17:32:53 -0400
Message-ID: <>


"Jon Heggland" <> wrote in message

>. To repeat myself, I quite like ORM. The NOLOT/LOT distinction

> may even be a useful abstraction for modelling, but to claim that ORM is
> logically different from the RM, and that the difference is crippling
> the RM, is counterproductive.

If you like ORM, you apparently understand what a LOT is. Could you please provide, for my benefit, a [semi]formal definition of what a LOT really is ?


> --
> Jon
Received on Sun Jul 03 2005 - 23:32:53 CEST

Original text of this message