Jon Heggland wrote:
> In article <5gbve.129762$xR7.7073902_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>,
> jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be says...
>
>>Also note, btw., that a Real RDBMS that allows you to define a domain
>>that captures all the aspects of an XML document as described in the
>>definition, would pretty much satisfy the definition.
>
> Not really. It would not have "an XML document as its fundamental unit
> of (logical) storage, just as a relational database has a row in a table
> as its fundamental unit of (logical) storage.",
Note that I said "pretty much". You are quite right that it would fit
the definition of XML-enabled DBMS better.
Received on Tue Jun 28 2005 - 15:10:08 CDT
