Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate& Darwin? [M.Gittens]

Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate& Darwin? [M.Gittens]

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:25:03 +0200
Message-ID: <62fba1h2791u7j3cmfn34h7oarhecebk2h@4ax.com>

On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:49:47 +0100, Paul <paul_at_test.com> wrote:

>I'd suggest that SQL's SUM *should* be iterated addition. And that all
>aggregates should return NULL if any of the attributes in the aggregated
>column are NULL. Surely if any of them are unknown, we must say that the
>sum or average is unknown also?
>
>What are the arguments for not doing this?

It does not eliminate nulls. Everything else is a botch-up.

Regards Received on Tue Jun 07 2005 - 10:25:03 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US