Re: theory and practice: ying and yang
From: Paul <paul_at_test.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:34:28 +0100
Message-ID: <42a04045$0$15012$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:34:28 +0100
Message-ID: <42a04045$0$15012$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Alexandr Savinov wrote:
>>> For any naïve
>>> (classical) thinker real numbers is something really existing but if we
>>> look at the problems deeper we will see that they are not needed.
>>
>> Do you have any support for this somewhat startling revelation?
>
> Real numbers do not help in solving contemporary problems and this why I
> find this apparatus almost useless. They are used and will be used by
> inertia.
You're not a fan of Wolfram's book A New Kind Of Science, by any chance?
Paul. Received on Fri Jun 03 2005 - 13:34:28 CEST