Re: theory and practice: ying and yang

"erk" <eric.kaun_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1117630887.078512.87010_at_g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> mountain man wrote (replying to Alfredo):

>> Date ignores the proofs of Godel and Chaitin.
>> He may be scientific, but he is at least 80 years
>> behind the implications of current set theory.
>> I will deal with this aspect in future threads.
>
> I'd like to see it - waving Godel about as some sort of postmodern
> deconstruction of set theory always makes for a fun conversation.

Here is a diagram showing the perspective I use: http://www.mountainman.com.au/GIF/logic_space_1.jpg

Here is an article:
http://www.mountainman.com.au/software/history/relational_model_incomplete.htm

-- 
Pete Brown
IT Managers & Engineers
Falls Creek
Australia
www.mountainman.com.au/software