erk wrote:
> mountain man wrote (replying to Alfredo):
> > Date ignores the proofs of Godel and Chaitin.
> > He may be scientific, but he is at least 80 years
> > behind the implications of current set theory.
> > I will deal with this aspect in future threads.
>
> I'd like to see it - waving Godel about as some sort of postmodern
> deconstruction of set theory always makes for a fun conversation.
Ooh, goody! Can we have something about Schrödinger's Cat too? ;-)
Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 08:45:05 CDT
