Re: theory and practice: ying and yang
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:27:41 +0200
Message-ID: <s1mo91tta8s5tabvp2e341dbd4ctem6squ_at_4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:27:41 +0200
Message-ID: <s1mo91tta8s5tabvp2e341dbd4ctem6squ_at_4ax.com>
On Tue, 31 May 2005 04:21:16 GMT, "mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote:
>> Are you saying that this method is preferrable to the "fat client" or
>> "middleware" method, where you have business logic held outside the
>> database in things like Cognos, Business Objects, or Crystal Reports? I
>> thought this was pretty much the same as most other people think.
>
>
>Absolutely preferable, because it entirely OBVIATES the client.
>End of story. There is no client required, and therefore no
>middleware required, at all.
In the top bar I can read:
RDBMS Portal Client for SQL Server
Regards Received on Tue May 31 2005 - 14:27:41 CEST