Re: deductive databases

"mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote:

> "Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:87t881l00onh3tibjbqvokll34kn2d67s9_at_4ax.com...
>
>> To say that recursion is not useful to solve part explosion problems
>> shows profound ignorance.
>
>
> 1) WTF is this critical inventory explosion problem?
> 2) How many organisations are experiencing this problem?

BOM explosion is a standard problem for any manufacturing or assembly company.

Ford, GM, Daimler/Chrysler are the canonical examples of such organizations.

A dealer orders a 2005 Magnum XI, with some set of requested features.

The order goes in, and gets recursively exploded into successively more detailed sets of inventory requests.

You need a car; that means you need:

• Chassis
• Engine
• Drive train
• Wheel assemblies, and everything to connect them to the drive train
• Seats

The engine, then, is a subsystem that must itself be exploded into a further bill of materials representing the components needed to build the engine.

Stereo makers (Panasonic, Pioneer, Sony, Harmon Kardon, ...) will have somewhat simpler BOM explosions. You may buy a stereo "system" which consists of:

• Receiver/Amp
• DVD player
• Tape deck
• Speakers
• Cabling

Each of which then explodes into a BOM that leads to drawing inventory.

The explosion reverberates in a number of ways...

-- 
"cbbrowne","_at_","gmail.com"
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/emacs.html
"[In the first  lecture of a course on complexity  theory]. If I teach
this  course thoroughly  enough, none  of  you will  attempt the  exam
questions on  this topic, and I  shall consider this to  be a complete
success."  -- Arthur Norman